Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 22;2001(1):CD002060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002060

Comparison 7. BiliBlanket vs conventional phototherapy.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Duration of phototherapy (hr) 6 462 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 7.79 [3.23, 12.34]
2 Use of exchange transfusion 4 214 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.62 [0.38, 6.93]
3 Use of additional phototherapy 9 656 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.57 [1.10, 2.24]
4 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over total treatment period (% change/d) 8 513 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.64 [2.25, 5.03]
5 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over total treatment period (% change/hr) 8 513 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.12 [0.08, 0.17]
6 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over first 24 hours of treatment (% change/24 hr) 5 139 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.51 [0.76, 6.25]
7 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over first 48 hours of treatment (% change/48 hr) 4 119 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 8.27 [4.62, 11.92]
8 Use of repeat phototherapy for rebound jaundice 5 439 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.72 [0.70, 4.27]