Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;10:27. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00027

Table 2.

Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between BRCA1/2 status and ER IHC status.

Category BRCA1/2 status ER IHC status
Wild type (n = 137) Mutation status (n = 26) P-value Bilateral concordant (n = 127) Bilateral discordant (n = 36) P-value
Age at menarche ≤ 14 years 60 13 0.56 57 16 0.963
>14 years 77 13 70 20
Menopause status Premenopausal 50 12 0.352 52 10 0.151
Menopausal 87 14 75 26
Age ≤ 50 years 49 15 0.036 56 8 0.018
>50 years 88 11 71 28
Family history Breast cancer 11 7 0.005 14 4 0.988
No history 126 16 113 32
pT pTis/pT1 54 12 0.521 52 14 0.824
pT2/pT3 83 14 75 22
BMI <24 91 18 0.78 92 17 0.005
≥24 46 8 35 19
Number of pregnancies ≤ 2 times 77 11 0.192 65 23 0.177
>2 times 60 15 62 13
pN LN-negative 98 14 0.075 89 23 0.48
LN-positive 39 12 38 13
Histopathology Lobular component 21 2 0.537 19 4 0.558
No lobular component 116 24 108 32
Invasive component Bilateral invasive carcinoma 78 17 0.652 73 22 0.909
Unilateral invasive carcinoma 44 6 40 10
Bilateral carcinoma in situ 15 3 14 4
ER status Bilateral positive 89 17 0.022
Bilateral discordant 34 2
Bilateral negative 14 7
BRCA1/2 status Wide type 103 34 0.07
Mutation type 24 2

pT, pathological tumor stage; pN, pathological lymphnode stage; BMI, Body Mass Index.