Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 17;10:2585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59074-4

Table 3.

Validation of the most potent interactions identified in the in vitro binding assay at 10 μM (see Methods, Fig. 2, Supplementary Table 5) using an orthogonal assay that directly measures kinase catalytic activity using a widely-validated radiometric assay40.

Kinase Group Gene Name Kinase complex and aliases Niraparib Rucaparib
CMGC DYRK1B 82% 53%
CMGC CDK16 CDK16/cyclin Y (PCTAIRE, PCTK1) n.b. 82%
CAMK PIM3 15% 78%
CMGC DYRK1A DYRK1 76% 49%
CMGC HIPK1 40% −16%
CAMK MYLK4 19% 36%
Other AURKB Aurora B 34% n.b.
CMGC HIPK2 23% −6%
CAMK PIM1 22% 27%*
CMGC CSNK2A1 CK2a 12% 21%
AGC LATS2 17% n.b.
CMGC CSNK2A2 CK2a2 −1% 17%
AGC CIT STK21 10% 15%
Other HASPIN Haspin 10% −6%
CMGC CDK4 CDK4/cyclin D3 n.b. 10%
CMGC HIPK3 5% −12%
CAMK TSSK3 STK22C n.b. −1%
PKL PIK3C3 VPS34 −1%* n.b.
CAMK PIM2 −5% n.b.
CAMK STK17A DRAK1 n.d. −6%

The table displays the average of duplicate (n = 2) measurements of the percentage of enzyme inhibition relative to DMSO controls sorted by maximum percentage of inhibition. All assays were performed using 1 μM drug concentration and the appropriate Km concentration of ATP. From all the tested kinases, only 4 inhibit the enzyme by >50%. These four most potent interactions, expected to be submicromolar, are displayed at the top of the table and in bold. n.b. not binding. n.d. not determined due to low binding (Supplementary Table 5). * n = 1.