Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 17;10:2707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59744-3

Table 2.

Comparison of EGFR mutation detection between our targeted capture sequencing assay and a commercial ddPCR assay.

ddPCR NGS Results
Mutation Wild type Total
Mutation 11 2 13 Sensitivity (%) 84.6% (95% CI:54.5%–98.1%)
Wild type 0 27 27 Specificity (%) 100% (95% CI:87.2%–100%)
Total 11 29 40 Concordance (%) 95% (95% CI:83.1%–99.4%)