Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;19:19. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-00997-7

Table 2.

Effect of empagliflozin on morphometric parameters of different organs and body weight in the lean control and ZSF1 groups

Control Empa ZSF1 ZSF1 + Empa
Spleen (mg mm−1) 17.45 ± 0.38 16.55 ± 0.62 20.90 ± 0.32* 18.53 ± 0.81#
Liver (mg mm−1) 286.40 ± 12.58 264.80 ± 7.80 771.40 ± 34.64* 547.90 ± 21.37*,#
Kidney (mg mm−1) 40.52 ± 1.33 41.58 ± 1.34 55.22 ± 1.46* 54.92 ± 1.60*
Perirenal fat (mg mm−1) 11.32 ± 1.85 8.47 ± 1.63 183.70 ± 36.89* 100.60 ± 27.25*,#
Left lung (mg mm−1) 11.06 ± 0.20 10.65 ± 0.65 12.92 ± 0.69* 11.02 ± 0.25#
Dry weight of left lung (mg mm−1) 2.30 ± 0.03 2.16 ± 0.06 2.70 ± 0.08* 2.42 ± 0.06#
3 lobes of lung (mg mm−1) 17.94 ± 0.41 16.40 ± 0.41 21.48 ± 1.64* 17.23 ± 0.37#
Heart (mg mm−1) 31.93 ± 0.66 28.74 ± 0.75* 38.98 ± 0.95* 35.40 ± 0.63*,#
Tibial length (mm) 41.76 ± 0.35 42.54 ± 0.53 40.22 ± 0.42 39.89 ± 0.43
Weight (g) 407.70 ± 9.07 366.00 ± 7.67* 523.80 ± 19.93* 478.90 ± 8.73*,#

Organs were weighted and indexed to the respective tibial length. Values are shown as mean ± SEM of n = 7–10 per group

Empa empagliflozin

* P < 0.05 vs control group and #P < 0.05 vs ZSF1 group