Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 24;146(7):1889–1901. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32580

Table 2a.

Cox regression analyses for overall survival and time to failure of first‐line treatment per systemic treatment strategy

Overall survival (n = 2,204) Time to failure of first‐line treatment (n = 1,700)
Patients No. Median OS (months) Univariable analyses Multivariable analyses Patients No. Median TTF (months) Univariable analyses Multivariable analyses
HR 95% CI p value HR 95% CI p value HR 95% CI p value HR 95% CI p value
Systemic treatment strategy
Monotherapy 228 4.1 1.71 1.48–1.98 <0.001 1.67 1.43–1.96 <0.001 205 2.5 1.51 1.29–1.77 <0.001 1.65 1.39–1.96 <0.001
Doublet 980 7.4 Ref Ref 683 4.5 Ref Ref
Triplet 758 7.7 0.94 0.85–1.03 0.188 0.92 0.83–1.02 0.110 666 4.8 0.89 0.79–0.99 0.027 0.92 0.82–1.04 0.179
Trastuzumab‐containing regimen 215 11.2 0.62 0.53–0.72 <0.001 0.63 0.54–0.74 <0.001 126 6.7 0.62 0.51–0.76 <0.001 0.62 0.51–0.76 <0.001
Targeted therapy‐containing regimen (nontrastuzumab) 23 11.9 0.73 0.48–1.11 0.142 0.67 0.44–1.03 0.068 20 9.2 0.54 0.35–0.86 0.009 0.53 0.33–0.83 0.006
Age, years
<60 741 7.8 Ref Ref 581 4.8 Ref Ref
60–69 856 7.5 1.03 0.93–1.14 0.542 1.01 0.91–1.12 0.901 669 4.6 0.99 0.89–1.11 0.904 0.95 0.85–1.07 0.432
70–79 566 7.0 1.06 0.95–1.19 0.280 1.01 0.89–1.14 0.893 417 4.3 1.00 0.88–1.13 0.937 0.92 0.80–1.06 0.227
≥80 41 6.5 1.26 0.92–1.74 0.153 1.03 0.74–1.43 0.873 33 4.1 1.19 0.84–1.69 0.330 0.94 0.65–1.35 0.721
Sex
Male 1,670 7.5 Ref Ref 1,290 4.6 Ref Ref
Female 534 7.5 1.02 0.93–1.13 0.645 0.92 0.83–1.03 0.135 410 4.6 1.01 0.90–1.13 0.909 0.93 0.83–1.05 0.251
Performance status
0 or 1 1,220 8.3 Ref Ref 902 4.8 Ref Ref
≥2 152 4.7 1.73 1.46–2.06 <0.001 1.61 1.36–1.92 <0.001 114 2.9 1.53 1.26–1.87 <0.001 1.39 1.14–1.70 0.001
Unknown 832 6.8 1.20 1.09–1.31 <0.001 1.16 1.06–1.27 0.002 684 4.3 1.14 1.03–1.26 0.011 1.14 1.02–1.26 0.016
Comorbidities
0 805 7.6 Ref Ref 652 4.8 Ref Ref
1 621 7.0 0.94 0.84–1.04 0.233 0.94 0.84–1.05 0.272 475 4.1 0.95 0.85–1.08 0.442 0.97 0.85–1.10 0.600
≥2 702 7.6 1.00 0.90–1.11 0.975 0.96 0.86–1.07 0.460 538 4.7 0.97 0.87–1.09 0.654 0.95 0.84–1.07 0.414
Unknown 76 10.5 0.69 0.54–0.88 0.003 0.70 0.54–0.89 0.004 35 6.2 0.77 0.55–1.09 0.140 0.74 0.52–1.05 0.088
Tumor location
Esophagus 1,014 7.8 Ref Ref 772 4.6 Ref Ref
Gastroesophageal junction or cardia 410 7.6 0.95 0.85–1.07 0.395 0.95 0.84–1.08 0.417 316 5.0 0.90 0.79–1.03 0.131 0.92 0.80–1.06 0.268
Stomach 780 6.9 1.08 0.98–1.18 0.132 1.02 0.91–1.15 0.698 612 4.4 0.98 0.88–1.09 0.691 0.98 0.85–1.12 0.729
Histology
Adenocarcinoma 2,056 7.6 Ref Ref 1,580 3.7 Ref Ref
Squamous cell carcinoma 128 6.5 1.24 1.03–1.48 0.021 1.22 1.01–1.48 0.040 104 4.7 1.40 1.15–1.71 0.001 1.13 1.08–1.67 0.008
Carcinoma NOS 20 4.6 1.54 0.99–2.40 0.054 1.44 0.92–2.25 0.112 16 3.1 1.27 0.77–2.07 0.347 1.03 0.73–2.00 0.452
Liver metastasis 1,169 7.4 0.98 0.90–1.07 0.628 1.17 1.06–1.29 0.002 920 4.6 1.00 0.90–1.10 0.943 1.22 1.01–1.26 0.041
Distant lymph node metastasis 890 7.2 1.06 0.97–1.15 0.226 1.17 1.07–1.29 0.001 684 4.5 0.97 0.88–1.07 0.571 1.16 0.92–1.14 0.620
Peritoneal metastasis 524 6.9 1.22 1.11–1.35 <0.001 1.42 1.25–1.61 <0.001 385 4.1 1.11 0.99–1.24 0.079 1.31 1.05–1.41 0.009
Lung metastasis 430 7.0 1.09 0.98–1.21 0.122 1.16 1.04–1.29 0.010 327 4.1 1.14 1.01–1.29 0.032 1.13 1.02–1.32 0.021
Other metastases locations 499 6.6 1.25 1.13–1.39 <0.001 1.35 1.22–1.50 <0.001 379 4.1 1.23 1.09–1.38 <0.001 1.16–1.47 <0.001
Year of diagnosis 0.95 0.93–0.97 <0.001 0.97 0.95–0.99 0.009 1.00 0.97–1.02 0.724 1.02 0.99–1.05 0.230

Cox regression analyses in patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 for overall survival and patients between 2010 and 2015 for time to failure of first‐line treatment. Both univariable and multivariable analyses are displayed for first‐line systemic therapy subdivided in strategies (Table 2a) as well as regimens (Table 2b). Hazard ratios were adjusted for age, sex, performance status, number of comorbidities, tumor location, histology, metastases locations and year of diagnosis. Systemic treatment strategies were divided in chemotherapy regimens (monotherapy, doublet and triplet), trastuzumab‐containing regimens and nontrastuzumab targeted therapy‐containing regimens. Systemic treatment regimens were dived as follows: monotherapy; fluoropyrimidine doublets (with a platinum [but not cisplatin], taxane or irinotecan); cisplatin doublets (with a fluoropyrimidine, taxane or etoposide); gemcitabine doublets (with a platinum/cisplatin); platinum (but not cisplatin)/taxane doublets; anthracycline triplets (with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum/cisplatin); taxane triplets (with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum/cisplatin); trastuzumab‐containing regimens; and (nontrastuzumab) targeted therapy‐containing regimens.

Abbreviations: A, anthracycline; C, cisplatin; CI, confidence interval; E, etoposide; F, fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5‐FU); G, gemcitabine; HR, hazard ratio; I, irinotecan; NOS, not otherwise specified; OS, overall survival; P, platinum compound (oxaliplatin or carboplatin); T, taxane; TTF, time to failure.