Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;34(9):1597–1608. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3735

Table 4.

Bone Resorption Parameters After 2 and 12 Months of Romosozumab

Month 2 Month 12
Romosozumab Romosozumab
Placebo 210 mg QM Placebo 210 mg QM
N = 14 N = 15 p value a N = 31 N = 39 p value a
Cancellous bone
Cn‐ES/BS 3.4 1.8 0.022 2.9 1.1 <0.001
% (1.9, 4.5) (0.9, 3.2) (2.0, 4.5) (0.5, 1.7)
Cn‐Oc.S/BS 0.1 0.0 0.032 0.1 0.0 0.001
% (0.04, 0.2) (0.0, 0.1) (0.0, 0.3) (0.0, 0.03)
Cn‐Oc.N/BS 2.4 0.0 0.024 2.0 0.0 <0.001
/100 mm (1.0, 5.6) (0.0, 2.4) (0.0, 6.5) (0.0, 1.4)
Endocortical bone
Ec‐ES/BS 6.3 1.6 0.003 4.1 0.5 <0.001
% (3.3, 7.7) (0.6, 3.5) (3.0, 6.5) (0.2, 1.2)
Ec‐Oc.S/BS 0.2 0.0 0.12 0.0 b 0.0 b <0.001
% (0.0, 0.3) (0.0, 0.1) (0.0, 0.4) (0.0, 0.0)
Ec‐Oc.N/BS 4.4 0.0 0.14 0.0 c 0.0 c 0.001
/100 mm (0.0, 7.7) (0.0, 4.8) (0.0, 8.4) (0.0, 0.0)

Values are median (Q1, Q3) unless otherwise specified.

Cn =  cancellous; Ec =  endocortical; ES/BS =  eroded surface per unit of bone surface; Oc.N/BS =  osteoclast number per unit of bone surface; Oc.S/BS =  osteoclast surface per unit of bone surface; Q1, Q3 =  quartiles 1 and 3; QM =  once monthly.

a

the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

b

Mean ± SD: 0.3 ± 0.7 in placebo, 0.03 ± 0.09 in romosozumab.

c

Mean ± SD: 8.1 ± 16.2 in placebo, 1.0 ± 2.9 in romosozumab.