Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2020 Jan 6;136:105445. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105445

Table 2.

Association between TCs exposure and the risk of IGT and T2DM among 429 men and 471 women in NHANES (2013-2014)

Model HEALTHY IGT T2DM

N Prev. (%) N Prev. (%) OR P-value 95%CI N Prev. (%) OR P-value 95%CI
Men
model 1
Triclocarban 103 39.16 22 41.51 1.10 0.750 0.61-2.01 52 48.60 1.47 0.096 0.93-2.31
Triclosan 195 74.14 43 81.13 1.50 0.284 0.71-3.15 80 74.77 1.03 0.901 0.62-1.73
model 2
Triclocarban 103 39.16 22 41.51 0.94 0.847 0.49-1.80 52 48.60 1.26 0.419 0.72-2.21
Triclosan 195 74.14 43 81.13 2.12 0.067 0.95-4.72 80 74.77 1.38 0.310 0.74-2.59
model 3
Triclocarban 103 39.16 22 41.51 0.94 0.862 0.49-1.81 52 48.60 1.29 0.375 0.73-2.27
Triclosan 195 74.14 43 81.13 2.12 0.066 0.95-4.76 80 74.77 1.36 0.339 0.72-2.57
Women
model 1
Triclocarban 99 35.74 30 46.88 1.59 0.099 0.92-2.75 65 51.18 1.88 0.004* 1.23-2.89
Triclosan 211 76.17 44 68.75 0.69 0.219 0.38-1.25 94 74.02 0.89 0.640 0.55-1.44
model 2
Triclocarban 99 35.74 30 46.88 1.47 0.214 0.80-2.70 65 51.18 1.80 0.030* 1.06-3.07
Triclosan 211 76.17 44 68.75 0.87 0.671 0.48-1.68 94 74.02 1.11 0.721 0.62-2.01
model 3
Triclocarban 99 35.74 30 46.88 1.45 0.234 0.79-2.67 65 51.18 1.79 0.032* 1.05-2.05
Triclosan 211 76.17 44 68.75 0.86 0.650 0.44-1.67 94 74.02 1.09 0.780 0.60-1.97

Note:

*

, P <0.05;

**

, P< 0.01.

Model 1: unadjusted model;

Model 2: adjusted for age, race, BMI, education, ratio of family income to poverty, smoking;

Model 3: adjusted for age, race, BMI, education, ratio of family income to poverty, smoking, exercise and hypertension.