Spring 2007.
Methods | FLUOXETINE Randomized controlled trial Setting: clinic, USA Recruitment: community volunteers |
|
Participants | 247 smokers, >= 10 CPD; 54% F, av. age 44, av. CPD 23, 44% history of MDD | |
Interventions | 1. Fluoxetine 60 mg (titrated up over 2 w) for 12 weeks 2. Placebo Both arms: group behavioural counselling, 9 meetings over 12 weeks | |
Outcomes | Abstinence at 6m (prolonged from 2 w after quit date) Validation: CO < 10 ppm, urine cotinine < 20 ng/ml | |
Notes | First included as Spring 2004 with unpublished data. Full publication reports sustained abstinence Funding: National Institutes of Health, Veterans Affairs. Medication provided by Eli Lilly and Company. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "The study pharmacist stratified participants by depression history and used computer‐ generated random numbers to assign them to drug or placebo." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocated by unblinded pharmacist, method not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double blind, "Research staff and participants were blinded to medication status." "Drug assignment was guessed correctly by 59.8% of placebo and 64.6% of fluoxetine participants. Facilitators guessed correctly for 65.3% of placebo and 55.6% of fluoxetine participants." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Withdrawals/lost to follow‐up 40% for fluoxetine, 48% placebo. Authors report similar results from missing assumed smoking and GEE analyses. All participants included in MA. |