Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 8;2014(1):CD000031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000031.pub4

Spring 2007.

Methods FLUOXETINE
Randomized controlled trial
 Setting: clinic, USA
 Recruitment: community volunteers
Participants 247 smokers, >= 10 CPD; 54% F, av. age 44, av. CPD 23, 44% history of MDD
Interventions 1. Fluoxetine 60 mg (titrated up over 2 w) for 12 weeks
 2. Placebo
 Both arms: group behavioural counselling, 9 meetings over 12 weeks
Outcomes Abstinence at 6m (prolonged from 2 w after quit date)
 Validation: CO < 10 ppm, urine cotinine < 20 ng/ml
Notes First included as Spring 2004 with unpublished data. Full publication reports sustained abstinence
Funding: National Institutes of Health, Veterans Affairs. Medication provided by Eli Lilly and Company.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "The study pharmacist stratified participants by depression history and used computer‐ generated random numbers to assign them to drug or placebo."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocated by unblinded pharmacist, method not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, "Research staff and participants were blinded to medication status." "Drug assignment was guessed correctly by 59.8% of placebo and 64.6% of fluoxetine participants. Facilitators guessed correctly for 65.3% of placebo and 55.6% of fluoxetine participants."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Withdrawals/lost to follow‐up 40% for fluoxetine, 48% placebo. Authors report similar results from missing assumed smoking and GEE analyses. All participants included in MA.