Table 6.
Statistical fit of all three methods (UM model, S model and the model from this study), locally fitted, on hourly data from all eight stations, described by the Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), the mean bias error (MBE) and the root mean square error (RMSE), with bold numbers indicating the best model
| UM/S/this study | NSE [−] | MBE [W m−2] | RMSE [W m−2] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kyanjing | 0.83/0.67/0.84 | 1/−2/0 | 24/32/23 |
| YalaBC | 0.86/0.81/0.90 | 1/−2/0 | 25/28/21 |
| YalaGL | 0.88/0.84/0.92 | 1/−2/‐2 | 24/27/19 |
| Naulek | 0.82/0.84/0.89 | 6/−1/0 | 27/26/21 |
| Mera | 0.81/0.82/0.86 | 2/−1/−4 | 29/28/25 |
| Changri Nup | 0.86/0.84/0.87 | 4/−1/0 | 24/25/23 |
| Chhota Shigri GL | 0.79/0.77/0.77 | 1/−1/0 | 26/27/27 |
| Chhota Shigri M | 0.67/0.67/0.74 | 5/−1/0 | 35/36/32 |