Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 13;61(2):276–290. doi: 10.1002/em.22343

Table 8.

DNA Damage in Female B6C3F1/N Mice Following Exposure to GSM‐Modulated Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation (1,900 MHz) for 14 Weeksa

Dose (W/kg) % Tail DNA (100 cells)b P valuec % Hedgehogs (100 cells)b % Tail DNA (150 cells)b P value % Hedgehogs (150 cell)d
Frontal cortex
0e 8.11 ± 2.13 3.40 ± 1.47
GSM 2.5 7.33 ± 0.90 0.657 1.00 ± 0.45
5.0 7.69 ± 1.98 0.744 2.00 ± 0.84
10.0 5.74 ± 0.62 0.779 1.00 ± 0.32
P = 0.861f
Hippocampus
0 8.15 ± 1.65 2.60 ± 1.69
GSM 2.5 6.23 ± 1.00 0.866 0.80 ± 0.58
5.0 4.54 ± 1.29 0.923 1.20 ± 0.58
10.0 5.22 ± 1.23 0.942 1.60 ± 1.36
P = 0.933
Cerebellum
0 5.88 ± 0.85 0.20 ± 0.20
GSM 2.5 6.56 ± 1.22 1.000 1.20 ± 0.73
5.0 5.26 ± 0.59 1.000 0.60 ± 0.40
10.0 6.54 ± 1.71 1.000 1.80 ± 0.73
P = 0.606
Liver
0 5.48 ± 0.60 0.60 ± 0.40 4.34 ± 0.60 0 ± 0
GSM 2.5 7.06 ± 0.61 0.096 3.40 ± 1.17 7.44 ± 0.48 0.027 0 ± 0
5.0 6.36 ± 0.25 0.117 1.20 ± 0.37 5.45 ± 0.96 0.032 0 ± 0
10.0 6.47 ± 0.79 0.124 2.60 ± 1.33 6.52 ± 0.75 0.030 0 ± 0
P = 0.249 P = 0.133
Peripheral blood leukocytes
0 1.03 ± 0.13 0.20 ± 0.20 2.15 ± 0.08 0 ± 0
GSM 2.5 1.25 ± 0.44 0.335 0.20 ± 0.20 2.58 ± 0.35 0.504 0 ± 0
5.0 1.17 ± 0.08 0.400 0 ± 0 2.23 ± 0.19 1.000 0 ± 0
10.0 1.32 ± 0.34 0.316 0 ± 0 2.28 ± 0.51 1.000 0 ± 0
P = 0.266 P = 0.657
a

Exposure began at ~5 weeks of age.

b

Mean ± SE.

c

Pairwise comparison with the sham control group; exposed group values are significant at P ≤ 0.025 by Williams' or Dunn's test.

d

A comet figure was considered a hedgehog if ≥90% DNA was in the tail. % Hedgehogs = number of comets with ≥90% tail DNA/150.

e

Sham control; no exposure to GSM‐modulated cell phone RFR.

f

Dose‐related trend derived from one‐tailed linear regression or Jonckheere's test; the trend is significant when P ≤ 0.025.