Table 8.
Dose (W/kg) | % Tail DNA (100 cells)b | P valuec | % Hedgehogs (100 cells)b | % Tail DNA (150 cells)b | P value | % Hedgehogs (150 cell)d | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frontal cortex | |||||||
0e | 8.11 ± 2.13 | 3.40 ± 1.47 | |||||
GSM | 2.5 | 7.33 ± 0.90 | 0.657 | 1.00 ± 0.45 | |||
5.0 | 7.69 ± 1.98 | 0.744 | 2.00 ± 0.84 | ||||
10.0 | 5.74 ± 0.62 | 0.779 | 1.00 ± 0.32 | ||||
P = 0.861f | |||||||
Hippocampus | |||||||
0 | 8.15 ± 1.65 | 2.60 ± 1.69 | |||||
GSM | 2.5 | 6.23 ± 1.00 | 0.866 | 0.80 ± 0.58 | |||
5.0 | 4.54 ± 1.29 | 0.923 | 1.20 ± 0.58 | ||||
10.0 | 5.22 ± 1.23 | 0.942 | 1.60 ± 1.36 | ||||
P = 0.933 | |||||||
Cerebellum | |||||||
0 | 5.88 ± 0.85 | 0.20 ± 0.20 | |||||
GSM | 2.5 | 6.56 ± 1.22 | 1.000 | 1.20 ± 0.73 | |||
5.0 | 5.26 ± 0.59 | 1.000 | 0.60 ± 0.40 | ||||
10.0 | 6.54 ± 1.71 | 1.000 | 1.80 ± 0.73 | ||||
P = 0.606 | |||||||
Liver | |||||||
0 | 5.48 ± 0.60 | 0.60 ± 0.40 | 4.34 ± 0.60 | 0 ± 0 | |||
GSM | 2.5 | 7.06 ± 0.61 | 0.096 | 3.40 ± 1.17 | 7.44 ± 0.48 | 0.027 | 0 ± 0 |
5.0 | 6.36 ± 0.25 | 0.117 | 1.20 ± 0.37 | 5.45 ± 0.96 | 0.032 | 0 ± 0 | |
10.0 | 6.47 ± 0.79 | 0.124 | 2.60 ± 1.33 | 6.52 ± 0.75 | 0.030 | 0 ± 0 | |
P = 0.249 | P = 0.133 | ||||||
Peripheral blood leukocytes | |||||||
0 | 1.03 ± 0.13 | 0.20 ± 0.20 | 2.15 ± 0.08 | 0 ± 0 | |||
GSM | 2.5 | 1.25 ± 0.44 | 0.335 | 0.20 ± 0.20 | 2.58 ± 0.35 | 0.504 | 0 ± 0 |
5.0 | 1.17 ± 0.08 | 0.400 | 0 ± 0 | 2.23 ± 0.19 | 1.000 | 0 ± 0 | |
10.0 | 1.32 ± 0.34 | 0.316 | 0 ± 0 | 2.28 ± 0.51 | 1.000 | 0 ± 0 | |
P = 0.266 | P = 0.657 |
Exposure began at ~5 weeks of age.
Mean ± SE.
Pairwise comparison with the sham control group; exposed group values are significant at P ≤ 0.025 by Williams' or Dunn's test.
A comet figure was considered a hedgehog if ≥90% DNA was in the tail. % Hedgehogs = number of comets with ≥90% tail DNA/150.
Sham control; no exposure to GSM‐modulated cell phone RFR.
Dose‐related trend derived from one‐tailed linear regression or Jonckheere's test; the trend is significant when P ≤ 0.025.