Avorn 1994.
Methods |
|
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Treatment duration: 6 months |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Odd versus even numbers in institutional identification number or telephone number (quasi‐RCT) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Inadequate, could subvert system by excluding people with certain number, or include more of those with a certain number |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding stated |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | NS |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Absolute numbers not always provided; 39 patients lost to follow‐up/withdrawn |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Primary outcome is reasonable though symptomatic would be better |
Other bias | High risk | Source of funding: Research grant from Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. |