Barbosa‐Cesnik 2011.
Methods |
|
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Treatment duration: 6 months |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer generated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | External, web based allocation |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Placebo drink matched, participants and clinicians blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | NS |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 100 participants randomised but no outcomes reported for them, they were actually not eligible to be randomised since they were culture negative |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | UTI is most appropriate outcome |
Other bias | High risk | Selection bias, representative nature of consenters is questionable Source of funding: National centre for alternative medicine at NIH |