Hess 2008.
Methods |
|
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No method reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Concealed, managed by the pharmacy |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding stated |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Unsure if outcome assessors blind, but all others were and outcome is objectively measured |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 10 patients lost to follow‐up and no details provided |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Appropriate outcome |
Other bias | Low risk | No apparent additional bias Source of funding: NS |