PACS Study 2008.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details on this aspect |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Open label study, could be possible to subvert randomisation |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open label |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Expected number of urine samples was less than expected. Losses to follow‐up/withdrawals: 2 lost and 28 did not complete treatment |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Outcomes are about feasibility not efficacy |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Many details missing or poorly detailed Source of funding: NS |