Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan 20;2003(1):CD001496. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001496

Kjellen 1981.

Methods Study Design: Parallel Randomised Controlled Trial 
 Randomisation: Random stated: Method ‐ alternation 
 Concealment of Allocation: Alternation ‐ inadequate 
 Double‐Blinding: Not stated or described 
 Withdrawals/Dropouts: Not described 
 Adverse Events: Not described 
 Statistical Analysis: Described
Participants Number randomised: 62 
 Number completed: not reported 
 Mean age (range): 52 (36‐65) 
 Diagnostic Criteria for Asthma: as per ATS 
 Diagnostic Criteria for GOR: Manometry, Acid perfusion test. Symptomatic GOR was not required for entry nor reported. 
 Association between GOR & Asthma tested? No ‐ not required for entry 
 H‐Pylori Tested?: No 
 Other diseases included: Not specified 
 Major exclusions: Not specified 
 Baseline severity of asthma: stated "more severe" p 191. Mean FEV1 pre bronchodilator 2.16 l/min 
 Baseline Severity of GOR: Not stated 
 Baseline Complications of GOR: hiatal hernia 55%; dysmotility 58%, positive acid perfusion test 35% and decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure 40%.
Interventions Conservative treatment of GOR including: elevation of head of bed; warm water after meals; avoid food 3 hours before bed time; refrain from aspirin &/or anticholinergic drugs; avoid procedures which raise intra‐abdominal pressure. 
 Control group were informed there was a suspicion of esophageal dysfunction but that results had to be checked in two months time. Both groups kept diaries of asthma drugs. 
 Duration of intervention: 8 weeks 
 Asthma medications were considered optimal at the time of entry into the study.
Outcomes Duration over which outcomes were measured: a comparison between the first and the third month was made for asthma medications. Patient reported improvement in symptoms was noted at the 2 month follow‐up. 
 Asthma symptoms (number who self‐reported an improvement) dyspnoea, wheeze, cough, expectoration; FEV1; beta‐agonist use;GOR symptoms (number who self‐reported an improvement).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? High risk Investigators aware as to order of treatment group assignment (Cochrane Grade C)