Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 27;28(2):670–680. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12901

Table 5.

Factors enabling and constraining the improvement process in West‐Friesland

  Enabling factors Constraining factors
Micro (operational) level

Facilitation of intervision meetings

Informal setting

Safe environment

Broad composition of professionals participating in meetings

Commitment of participating professionals

Personal relationships and trust among professionals from different organisations

Discrepancy between goal of intervision meetings and needs of participating professionals

Lack of continuity in intervision meeting attendance

Lack of time due to staff shortages and high case load

Meso (managerial) level

Process facilitation and management

Broad composition of steering group

Commitment on managerial level of participating organisations

Personal relationships and trust among managers from different organisations

Shared sense of urgency

Lack of continuity in steering group meeting attendance

Lack of ownership and accountability among steering group members

Conflicting organisational cultures and interests

Macro (regional and national) level

Regional policy to improve collaboration

Complementary collaborative initiatives in the region

Limiting privacy regulations

Lack of shared IT‐system

Separate payment systems

Lack of shared accountability

The enabling and constraining factors presented in this table were identified based on interviews, meeting notes and field notes.