Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;89(2):623–634. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13130

Table 1.

Average prey selection and movement responses to human disturbances and natural habitat. Each individual was modelled separately and then averaged using inverse variance models

Species Component Variable Coefficient CI n
Moose Selection Conifer −0.116 0.173 18
Deciduous/Mixedwood −0.203 0.196 17
Wetland 0.177 0.176 18
ln(Distance to LF) 0.050 0.042 18
ln(Distance to Poly) 0.012 0.088 18
ln(Distance to RIP) −0.058 0.045 18
Movement ln(SL) −0.851 0.039 18
ln(SL):Cos(Turn angle) 0.220 0.017 18
Cos(Turn angle) −0.821 0.135 18
CLI:ln(SL) 0.344 0.104 3
LIS:ln(SL) 0.060 0.217 2
PT:ln(SL)
Poly:ln(SL) 0.113 0.032 2
RIP:ln(SL) 0.080 0.032 18

The reference categories were ‘other’ landcover and ‘undisturbed forest’ for selection and movement, respectively.

Abbreviations: CLI, conventional seismic, low‐grade roads and ice roads; LIS, low‐impact seismic; PT, pipelines and transmission lines; Poly, polygonal disturbances; RIP, riparian habitat; SL, step length.