Table 2.
Age | Race | Education | Income | Persistent Breast Pain | Caregiving | Pain Catastrophizing | Cancer Worry | Perceived Risk | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | - | ||||||||
Race | .11 | - | |||||||
Education | −.07 | .33** | - | ||||||
Income | −.04 | .51** | .60** | - | |||||
Persistent Breast Pain | −.04 | .30** | .16 | .14 | - | ||||
Caregiving | −.10 | −.09 | −.18 | −.22 | .02 | - | |||
Pain Catastrophizing | −.07 | .16 | .10 | −.06 | .33** | .10 | - | ||
Cancer Worry | −.15 | −.16 | −.03 | −.25* | .14 | .18 | .28* | - | |
Perceived Risk | −.27* | .22 | .30** | .24* | .16 | .20 | .18 | .49** | - |
Note. Pearson correlation coefficients are reported for associations between continuous measures, point-biserial correlations are reported for associations between continuous and two-level categorical variables, and Pearson contingency coefficients are reported for associations between categorical variables.
Correlation is significant at 0.05 level
Correlation is significant at 0.01 level