Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2019 Dec 2;101(2):79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.10.007

Table 6.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Models for Any Contraceptive Use for Participants in the Lowest Quartile of DAP Scores; N = 138

aOR 95% CI

Age (years) 1.00 [0.94, 1.08]
Race/Ethnicity
 Latina Ref.
 Non-Latina Black 0.26 [0.05, 1.39]
 Non-Latina White 0.68 [0.20, 2.28]
 Multiracial/other 0.05 [0.01, 0.45]
Relationship Status
 Main Partner & Cohabiting Ref.
 Main Partner & Not Cohabiting 2.40 [0.83, 6.97]
 No Main Partner 0.68 [0.12, 3.95]
Nulliparous 3.09 [1.13, 8.46]
Education
 Less than high school Ref.
 High school or GED 0.67 [0.16, 2.75]
 Some Community College/Tech 0.99 [0.16, 6.31]
 College Degree or More 0.57 [0.09, 3.65]
Poverty
 Above 100% FPL Ref.
 Below 100% FPL 2.56 [1.02, 6.41]
 Missing 4.18 [0.79, 22.01]
State of Residence
 Texas Ref.
 New Mexico/Arizona 1.12 [0.32, 3.93]
 South Carolina 3.94 [0.62, 24.90]
 New Jersey 6.09 [0.77, 48.08]

Notes: aOR = adjusted Odds Ratio; Low DAP Score includes first quartile of DAP Scores and any contraceptive use includes long-acting reversible contraception, short-acting reversible contraception, and condoms.