Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun;40(6):1067–1073. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6073

Table 3:

Median values of the scan parameters, signal-to-noise ratio, image-quality scores, estimated effective dose, and the percentage difference for the 2 cohorts

Parameter 0–4 yr
5–9 yr
10–16 yr
I II % Diff I II % Diff I II % Diff
Tube current (mAs) 150 128 −15 182 162 −11 266 165 −38
CTDIvol (mGy) 7.4 4.4 −41 8.6 5.5 −36 20 7 −67
Scan length (cm) 17.6 17.8 1 20.3 21 5 26 27 1
DLP (mGy-cm) 125 77 −38 175 132 −24 522 240 −54
ED (mSv) 2.1 1.2 −40 2.2 1.7 −21 9.7 4.4 −55
SNR 16.4 13.4 −18 13.4 16.3 22 20.2 16.2 −20
IQ 3.67 4.00 9 4.00 4.00 0 4.33 4.00 −8

Note:—IQ indicates image quality; ED, effective dose; Diff, difference; I, baseline; II, follow-up.