Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb;40(2):224–230. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5927

The PSNR and NRMSE of synthetic FLAIR and DL-FLAIR images against conventional FLAIR images in various regionsa

Synthetic FLAIR Images DL-FLAIR Images
GM
    PSNR 27.16 ± 0.54b,c 34.03 ± 1.33b,c (+25.31%)
    NRMSE 0.47 ± 0.039b,c 0.33 ± 0.028b,c (−30.44%)
WM
    PSNR 29.51 ± 0.44b,c 35.45 ± 1.48b,c (+20.14%)
    NRMSE 0.37 ± 0.025b,c 0.27 ± 0.024b,c (−27.32%)
CSF
    PSNR 34.83 ± 1.37b,c 40.47 ± 1.37b,c (+16.21%)
    NRMSE 0.29 ± 0.027b,c 0.21 ± 0.017b,c (−27.36%)
Aggregate intracranial tissues
    PSNR 29.79 ± 0.71b 35.90 ± 1.21b (+20.54%)
    NRMSE 0.38 ± 0.024b 0.27 ± 0.016b (−28.66%)
a

Values are means ± SD. Percentage changes in the PSNR and NRMSE for DL-FLAIR vs synthetic FLAIR images are in parentheses.

b

P < .001 for synthetic FLAIR vs DL-FLAIR images.

c

P < .001 for GM vs WM, GM vs CSF, and WM vs CSF.