Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;11:937. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14756-5

Table 1.

PL and EL performance of the QDs with various combinations of shells and ligands.

Inorganic structure Ligands Film PL QY (%) EQE (%) Device lifetimea T50 (h)
CdSe/CdS Cd(RCOO)2 77 ± 2 0.25 ± 0.08 ~0.3
Cd(RPOOO) 70 ± 3 0.1–0.3 ~1
Zn(RCOO)2 75 ± 2 2–4 ~5–7
Mg(RCOO)2 42 ± 3 8–9 ~8000
RNH2 + RSH 77 ± 2 18–20 ~90,000
RNH2b 76 ± 2 18.5 ± 0.6 ~90,000
RNH2 76 ± 2 18.6 ± 0.6 ~90,000
CdSe/CdS/ZnS Zn(RCOO)2 80 ± 2 2.7 ± 0.5 ~3–5
TOPc 79 ± 2 15.4 ± 0.6 T95 @1000 nits ~400
RNH2b 79 ± 2 17.8 ± 0.4 T95 @1000 nits ~600
RNH2 + RSHb 78 ± 2 17–19 T95 @1000 nits ~550
CdSe/CdZnSe/CdZnS Zn(RCOO)2 74 ± 2 5–7 T95 @1000 nits ~80
TOPc 75 ± 2 15.8 ± 0.9 T95 @1000 nits ~3800

The data shown in italics are from QDs with electrochemically reactive ligands and the rest of the data are from QDs with electrochemically inert ligands.

aThe device lifetimes are estimated at an initial brightness of 100 nits if not noted.

bThese QDs are determined to retain their negatively charged carboxylate ligands (~15% of residual carboxylate ligands).

cThe percentage of carboxylate ligands of these QDs after ligand exchange by TOP was ~25%. This value is the lower limit for maintaining the dispersity of these QDs after TOP treatment.