Table 1.
Overview of clones used in the experiment
| Clone ID | Origin and status | Ploidy (x) | Genome size (2C‐value in pg) | GS category | Country | Latitude | Longitude | Plants used in the experiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D615 | EU‐native | 4 | 1.89 | Small | Russia (Sachalin) | 47.03 | 143.30 | 55 |
| FRA3 | EU‐native | 4 | 1.92 | Small | France | 44.68 | −1.02 | 56 |
| D620 | EU‐native | 4 | 2.06 | Large | Spain | 40.72 | 0.58 | 52 |
| D643 | EU‐native | 4 | 2.06 | Large | Italy | 44.72 | 11.53 | 59 |
| D659 | EU‐native | 6 | 2.96 | Russia (Sachalin) | 48.63 | 142.79 | 55 | |
| D538 | EU‐native | 6 | 3.02 | Romania | 45.00 | 29.22 | 56 | |
| D589 | EU‐native | 8 | 3.88 | Romania | 45.00 | 29.22 | 57 | |
| D553 | EU‐native | 8 | 3.95 | Hungary | 47.60 | 17.03 | 57 | |
| NA134 | NA‐invasive | 4 | 1.94 | Small | USA (MD) | 38.59 | −76.05 | 55 |
| NA94 | NA‐invasive | 4 | 1.95 | Small | USA (RI) | 41.18 | −71.57 | 55 |
| NA96 | NA‐invasive | 4 | 2.17 | Large | USA (NH) | 43.05 | −70.90 | 31 |
| NA159 | NA‐invasive | 4 | 2.21 | Large | USA (RI) | 41.36 | −71.64 | 51 |
| NA224 | NA‐invasive | 6 | 3.15 | USA (LA) | 30.19 | −89.54 | 39 | |
| NA148 | NA‐invasive | 6 | 3.18 | USA (MA) | 41.47 | −70.76 | 33 | |
| USA2 | NA‐invasive | 8 | 3.9 | USA (MA) | 42.34 | −71.09 | 53 | |
| D617 | NA‐invasive | 8 | 4.12 | USA (RI) | 41.79 | −71.37 | 57 | |
| NA124 | NA‐native | 4 | 2.24 | Large | USA (NH) | 43.05 | −70.90 | 20 |
| NA61 | NA‐native | 4 | 2.25 | Large | Canada (NB) | 46.07 | −64.72 | 56 |
| NA7 | NA‐native | 4 | 2.25 | Large | USA (NY) | 42.94 | −76.74 | 54 |
| NA8 | NA‐native | 4 | 2.3 | Large | USA (NY) | 42.94 | −76.74 | 45 |
The clones are arranged by origin and status, ploidy, and genome size. Note that only tetraploids were divided into small and large genome categories, to test the effect of genome size on the outcome of competition.