Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 21;10(3):1158–1179. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5943

Table 5.

General linear model analysis (GLMs) of shape and size variation between species taking into account the effect of the geographical context of divergence (Geog) and sample location as a nested factor

GLMs
  df SS Z p
Centroid Size
Species 1 24.215 2.111 .001*
Geog 1 0.070 0.169 .505
Species:Geog 1 1.787 1.572 .005*
Location 20 2.791 7.696 .001*
Residuals 516 5.307    
Total 539 34.171    
Shape
Species 1 0.931 3.156 .001*
Geog 1 0.211 1.382 .091
Species:Geog 1 0.092 0.401 .340
Location 20 1.691 11.199 .001*
Residuals 516 4.251    
Total 539 7.176    
Shape accounting for size
CS 1 0.914 6.221 .001*
Species 1 0.170 1.200 .130
Geog 1 0.221 1.440 .084
Species:Geog 1 0.041 −0.580 .718
Location 20 1.682 11.074 .001*
Residuals 515 4.148    
Total 539 7.176    

Individuals genetically classified as hybrids were excluded from this analysis.

Abbreviations: df, degrees of freedom; SS, sums of squares; Z, Z‐scores; p, p‐value (*indicates significant values).