Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;10(3):1613–1622. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6017

Table 1.

Model 1: The effects of habitat and treatment on the proportion of artificial nests dug up, showing the fixed effects that were included in each version of the model

Model (Intercept) Habitat Nest depth Habitat:Nest depth df logLik AICc Delta Weight Marginal R2 Conditional R2
Model 1.2 −3.37599 + + NA 6 −93.290 200.331 0.000 0.734 0.164 0.439
Model 1.1 −4.27503 + + + 8 −91.613 202.356 2.026 0.266 0.222 0.484
Model 1.3 −2.12057 + NA NA 4 −105.964 220.727 20.397 0.000 0.089 0.363
Model 1 −1.45160 NA NA NA 3 −108.776 224.023 23.692 0.000 0.000 0.364
Model 1.4 −2.20247 NA + NA 4 −119.715 248.230 47.899 0.000 0.068 0.276

Model formula: glmer(cbind(success, failure) ~ fixed effects + (1|Sett/Transect ID), family = Binomial) [NB: Model 1.4 random term is (1|Sett)].

Models were selected using AICc model selection, and the models with a delta AICc < 3 were kept (Table 2). The model formula is shown, with “success” representing the number of artificial nests that were dug up, and “failure” representing the number left in the ground. All models had the same random terms, except for Model 1.4, which only included “sett” to allow model convergence.