Table 2.
Coefficients for the best fitting versions of Model 1, which had a delta AICc < 3
| Estimate | SE | 95% CI | z value | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1.2 | |||||
| Intercept (Habitat [Grassland], nest depth [Control]) | −3.376 | 0.547 | 1.072 | −6.173 | <.001 |
| Habitat (Woodland) | 1.456 | 0.533 | 1.045 | 2.731 | <.01 |
| Nest depth (Surface) | 1.612 | 0.346 | 0.678 | 4.695 | <.001 |
| Nest depth (Underground) | 1.339 | 0.345 | 0.676 | 3.877 | <.001 |
| Model 1.1 | |||||
| Intercept (Habitat [Grassland], nest depth [Control]) | −4.275 | 0.834 | 1.635 | −5.127 | <.001 |
| Habitat (Woodland) | 2.605 | 0.913 | 1.789 | 2.853 | <.01 |
| Nest depth (Surface) | 2.710 | 0.762 | 1.494 | 3.555 | <.001 |
| Nest depth (Underground) | 2.178 | 0.761 | 1.492 | 2.863 | <.01 |
| Habitat (Woodland): nest depth (Surface) | −1.493 | 0.857 | 1.680 | −1.743 | .081 |
| Habitat (Woodland): nest depth (Underground) | −1.071 | 0.856 | 1.678 | −1.251 | .211 |
These models assessed the impact of habitat and nest depth on the proportion of artificial nests dug up. The untransformed estimates and standard errors are shown, along with the 95% confidence intervals, z value, and p value.