Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;11(1):e03261-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03261-19

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of reconstructed genome bins and their relative abundances

Bin IDa Taxonomy
(class)
No. of
contigs
Assem.
sizeb
(Mbp)
GC
content
(%)
Est.
comp.c
(%)
Est.
cont.d
(%)
% relative abundance based on 16S rRNA gene sequencese
0.22 μm
(D22)
3 μm
(D22)
0.22 μm
(D71)
3 μm
(D71)
0.22 μm
(avg)
3 μm
(avg)
Synechococcus sp.
YX04-3 (Bin1)
Cyanobacteria 16 2.46 59.3 99.50 0.00 30.73 16.14 19.56 11.40 34.00 14.15
Muricauda sp.
Bin2
Flavobacteria 5 3.1 42 99.00 1.54 41.83 19.94 30.51 17.82 26.91 17.47
Winogradskyella
sp. Bin3
Flavobacteria 10 3.15 33.8 99.20 2.47 5.12 12.61 1.20 6.81 3.17 10.80
Phycisphaera sp.
Bin4
Phycisphaerae 1 3.26 61.2 98.90 0.00 6.93 31.36 17.68 32.57 10.41 27.57
Oricola sp.
Bin5
Alphaproteo-
bacteria
7 3.63 64.8 99.20 0.39 8.03 1.82 4.77 1.31 6.49 1.67
Balneola sp.
Bin6
Flavobacteria 11 3.65 40 100 0.00 2.70 1.19 16.87 8.75 8.46 5.09
a

ID, identifier.

b

Assem. size, assembly size.

c

Est. comp., estimated completeness.

d

Est. cont., estimated contamination.

e

Percent relative abundance based on 16S rRNA gene sequences from 0.22-to-3-μm and >3-μm size fractions on day 22 (D22) and 71 (D71) of cultivation. The average information (avg) for 36 samples collected from two size fractions, 0.22-to-3-μm and >3-μm size fractions are shown in the two rightmost columns.