Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Ethn Dis. 2013 Autumn;23(4):401–408.

Table 2:

Outcomes of Interventions

Study author, year Mean baseline A1C, % Intervention mean change in A1C, % Control mean change in A1C, % Statistical significance
Anderson, 2005 8.6 8.74 baseline;
8.34 post intervention
8.41 baseline;
8.13 post intervention
No sign difference; sign pre/post decrease in HbA1c (p<0.001)
Anderson-Loftin, 2002 50% elevated levels Decreased 1.18 No control P=0.0106
Carter, 2011 8.9 9.0 baseline;
6.82 post intervention
8.8 baseline;
7.9 post intervention
P<0.05
OR=4.58 to reach A1c<7 if in intervention
Davis, 2010 9.3 (intervention);
8.9 (control)
9.4 baseline;
8.3 6-mo post;
8.2 12-mo post
8.8 baseline;
8.6 6-mo post intervention;
8.6 12-mo post
P=0.003 6-mo
P=0.004 12-mo
Hawkins, 2010 8.95 Decreased 1.7 Decreased 0.6 P=0.015
Mayer-Davis, 2004 9.6 (usual care);
9.7 (reimbursable care);
10.2 (intensive care)
Decreased 0.8 reimbursable; Decreased 1.6 intensive Decreased 1.1 Not significant
Rimmer, 2002 10.8 10.8 baseline;
10.3 post intervention
No control No significant difference
Tang, 2010 8.2 (intervention);
7.9 (control)
Decreased 0.68 Increased 0.32 P=0.008
Walker, 2010 41% elevated levels 39% elevated levels Not reported Not significant
Weinstock, 2011 7.02 (White);
7.58 (Black);
7.79 (Hispanic)
7.10 baseline, 6.87 5-yr post (White);
7.61 baseline, 6.95 5-yr post (Black);
7.69 baseline, 7.32 5-yr post (Hispanic)
6.97 baseline; 6.93 5-yr post (White);
7.56 baseline, 7.20 5-yr post (Black);
7.94 baseline, 7.82 5-yr post (Hispanic)
Treatment effect not significant (Black, White)
Treatment effect 0.50 (95%CI 0.22–0.78) (Hispanic)