Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 17;6(2):e03415. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03415

Table 2.

Effects of pathways on screen time, by gender.

Path Total
Female
Male
Path weight difference
Effecta P Effecta P Effecta P Δχ2 (1, N = 5958)
SES at birth (T1) - > SES in adolescence .476 < .001 .442 < .001 .510 < .001 14.70, p < .001
SES in adolescence (T3) - > internalizing (T3) .024 .046 .040 .028 .008 .677 2.37, p = .123
SES in adolescence (T3) - > externalizing (T3) .025 .052 .035 .050 .014 .453 .919, p = .338
SES in adolescence (T3) - > level of screen time (T3) .019 .136 .059 < .001 -.008 .662 5.107, p = .024
Internalizing (T3) - > level of screen time (T3) .003 .831 .018 .384 -.009 .654 .618, p = .432
Externalizing (T3) - > level of screen time (T3) .118 < .001 .129 < .001 .119 < .001 2.379, p = .123
SES in adolescence (T3) - > level of physical inactivity (T3) .106 < .001 .094 < .001 .116 < .001 .758, p = .384
Internalizing (T3) - > level of physical inactivity (T3) .079 < .001 .040 .048 .115 < .001 11.97, p = .001
Externalizing (T3) - > level of physical inactivity (T3) .007 .619 .056 .007 -.050 .018 12.65, p < .001
Level of screen time (T3) - > level of physical inactivity (T3) .044 < .001 .058 .001 .035 .055 2.051, p = .152

Note. a Standardized regression coefficients; significant results are in boldface; ΔR2 = .195 for SES in adolescence among females; ΔR2 = .023 for total screen time among females; ΔR2 = .022 for physical inactivity among females; ΔR2 = .260 for SES in adolescence among males; ΔR2 = .013 for total screen time among males; ΔR2 = .025 for physical inactivity among males.