Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 9;17:100541. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100541

Table 3.

Comparison of phase I designs under dose-toxicity Scenario 2.

Dose DLT rate Designs
3 + 3 3 + 3@9,2 CS(40; 3,6,9) CS(25; 5,11) CS(35; 2,6) CS(50; 1,3,5) CS(50) mTPI mTPI2 CRM
Proportion of recommended dose (MTD) dose levels (%)
0 3 3 3 9 2 0 0 0 0 0
1 0.05 10 13 9 24 8 2 2 1 0 0
2 0.10 18 22 16 31 14 4 4 7 5 3
3 0.15 21 24 19 23 22 6 6 20 21 9
4 0.20 20 21 21 10 22 9 10 29 28 19
5 0.25 18 13 20 3 19 17 21 28 28 32
6 0.35 9 4 11 0 11 31 36 14 17 29
7 0.50 2 0 1 0 2 26 20 1 2 8
8 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0
9 0.90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Proportion of patients treated (%)
1 0.05 24 23 21 38 18 9 7 18 17 7
2 0.10 23 23 22 31 21 10 8 23 23 7
3 0.15 20 21 20 20 21 12 10 25 25 10
4 0.20 15 16 17 8 18 13 12 20 20 17
5 0.25 10 10 12 3 13 15 17 11 11 25
6 0.35 5 5 6 0 7 17 22 4 4 20
7 0.50 2 1 2 0 2 15 17 0 0 12
8 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 3
9 0.90 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0



Average number of patients 18.7 23.3 24.9 24.6 17.7 15.6 22.6 21.0 21.0 21.0
Percent toxicity (%) 18.1 17.5 17.2 12.9 18.4 30.5 31.3 14.8 14.8 27.5