Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 9;17:100541. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100541

Table 4.

Comparison of phase I designs under dose-toxicity Scenario 3.

Dose DLT rate Designs
3 + 3 3 + 3@9,2 CS(40; 3,6,9) CS(25; 5,11) CS(35; 2,6) CS(50; 1,3,5) CS(50) mTPI mTPI2 CRM
Proportion of recommended dose (MTD) levels (%)
0 10 11 9 26 7 0 2 0 0 0
1 0.10 9 9 8 17 7 2 2 6 3 2
2 0.10 8 9 7 15 7 2 2 7 10 5
3 0.10 7 12 6 12 8 1 1 14 15 6
4 0.10 30 39 31 23 32 13 13 26 20 21
5 0.25 36 20 39 6 38 76 80 45 46 58
6 0.80 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 6 8
7 0.90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Proportion of patients treated (%)
1 0.10 29 28 26 47 23 11 9 27 27 11
2 0.10 19 18 17 22 18 10 8 23 24 7
3 0.10 16 15 15 14 16 11 8 20 20 8
4 0.10 16 20 19 11 19 15 14 16 16 22
5 0.25 15 16 19 5 19 33 46 11 11 38
6 0.80 4 4 4 0 5 18 14 2 2 10
7 0.90 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 4



Average number of patients 18.2 22 23.5 24.0 17.2 13.3 19.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Percent toxicity (%) 20.0 19.4 18.7 17.5 19.2 30.1 29.1 13.2 13.2 26.2