Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;19(3):214–225. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30485-5

Table 3.

Secondary outcomes at 96 weeks

Amiloride (n=102) Fluoxetine (n=97) Riluzole (n=96) Placebo (n=98) Amiloride vs placebo
Fluoxetine vs placebo
Riluzole vs placebo
Adjusted mean difference (95% CI)* p value Adjusted mean difference (95% CI)* p value Adjusted mean difference (95% CI)* p value
Expanded Disability Status Scale score 6·0 (1·0) 5·9 (1·2) 6·0 (1·1) 6·0 (1·1) 0·1 (−0·1 to 0·2) 0·61 −0·1 (−0·3 to 0·2) 0·54 0·1 (−0·2 to 0·2) 0·63
Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score (Z-score) −0·55 (1·87) −0·53 (1·66) −0·47 (1·69) −0·41 (1·78) 0·06 (−0·15 to 0·27) 0·59 −0·09 (−0·30 to 0·12) 0·42 0·02 (−0·19 to 0·23) 0·84
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test 41·1 (14·3) 36·8 (16·3) 38·4 (15·6) 41·9 (16·7) 0·9 (−1·9 to 3·7) 0·51 −1·1 (−3·9 to 1·8) 0·47 0·4 (−2·4 to 3·3) 0·76
9-Hole Peg Test (s−1) 0·03 (0·01) 0·03 (0·01) 0·03 (0·01) 0·03 (0·01) 0·00 (−0·00 to 0·00) 0·36 0·00 (−0·00 to 0·00) 0·85 0·00 (−0·00 to 0·00) 0·27
Symbol Digit Modalities Test 43·0 (14·9) 44·8 (13·7) 44·9 (14·2) 46·1 (14·5) −1·0 (−3·1 to 1·0) 0·32 −1·1 (−3·2 to 0·9) 0·29 −0·8 (−2·9 to 1·3) 0·44
High contrast (100%) visual acuity 50·1 (10·9) 50·5 (11·2) 47·8 (15·8) 49·1 (13·7) 3·0 (0·5 to 5·6) 0·020 1·8 (−0·7 to 4·4) 0·16 1·6 (−1·0 to 4·2) 0·22
Sloan low contrast visual acuity
5% contrast 31·8 (12·9) 32·6 (13·1) 31·2 (15·6) 32·4 (13·5) 1·0 (−1·8 to 3·8) 0·49 1·3 (−1·6 to 4·1) 0·38 1·5 (−1·4 to 4·3) 0·32
2·5% contrast 17·1 (14·2) 16·5 (13·2) 17·7 (14·2) 18·1 (13·4) 0·9 (−2·0 to 3·7) 0·55 1·3 (−1·5 to 4·1) 0·37 1·7 (−1·2 to 4·6) 0·25
1·25% contrast 5·2 (8·8) 4·0 (8·2) 6·1 (10·4) 6·8 (9·7) −0·6 (−2·7 to 1·5) 0·58 −0·8 (−2·9 to 1·3) 0·46 0·7 (−1·4 to 2·9) 0·49
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale 29 items version 2
Total score 72·3 (16·3) 69·7 (15·1) 72·9 (15·8) 69·5 (17·2) 3·7 (0·2 to 7·2) 0·037 0·5 (−3·0 to 4·0) 0·79 0·9 (−2·6 to 4·5) 0·60
Physical score 53·2 (12·0) 52·1 (11·4) 53·6 (12·4) 51·3 (12·7) 2·2 (−0·3 to 4·7) 0·089 0·7 (−1·8 to 3·3) 0·57 0·6 (−2·0 to 3·1) 0·66
Psychological score 19·1 (6·1) 17·7 (5·3) 19·3 (5·4) 18·3 (5·8) 1·5 (0·2 to 2·8) 0·025 −0·3 (−1·6 to 1·0) 0·68 0·5 (−0·9 to 1·8) 0·49
Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale version 2 44·2 (9·4) 44·4 (8·8) 44·6 (9·6) 43·6 (10·1) 0·5 (−1·6 to 2·5) 0·66 1·0 (−1·1 to 3·1) 0·35 0·6 (−1·5 to 2·8) 0·55
Neurological Fatigue Index
Summary score 19·4 (5·3) 18·3 (4·0) 19·7 (4·8) 18·3 (5·5) 0·9 (−0·2 to 2·0) 0·11 0·5 (−0·6 to 1·7) 0·36 0·7 (−0·4 to 1·9) 0·20
Physical score 16·3 (4·5) 15·4 (3·8) 16·4 (4·2) 15·0 (4·8) 1·2 (0·2 to 2·3) 0·019 0·7 (−0·3 to 1·8) 0·17 1·0 (−0·0 to 2·1) 0·061
Cognitive score 7·1 (2·5) 6·7 (2·1) 7·4 (2·1) 6·8 (2·9) 0·1 (−0·4 to 0·6) 0·70 0·2 (−0·4 to 0·7) 0·55 0·2 (−0·4 to 0·7) 0·55
Diurnal score 10·7 (3·2) 10·3 (2·9) 10·7 (2·5) 10·6 (2·6) −0·3 (−0·9 to 0·3) 0·36 −0·3 (−1·0 to 0·3) 0·29 −0·3 (−0·9 to 0·4) 0·40
Nocturnal score 8·7 (2·1) 8·3 (2·3) 8·4 (2·5) 8·2 (2·2) 0·6 (0·1 to 1·1) 0·013 0·4 (−0·1 to 0·9) 0·12 0·1 (−0·4 to 0·6) 0·65
EQ-5D-5L
Index score 0·60 (0·23) 0·62 (0·21) 0·60 (0·19) 0·61 (0·22) −0·01 (−0·06 to 0·04) 0·69 −0·02 (−0·06 to 0·03) 0·52 −0·01 (−0·05 to 0·04) 0·82
VAS score 66·1 (16·9) 67·5 (19·5) 61·7 (21·0) 65·2 (20·3) −2·1 (−7·6 to 3·5) 0·47 −3·0 (−8·6 to 2·6) 0·29 −3·0 (−8·6 to 2·7) 0·30
New or enlarging T2 lesions 3·7 (8·1) 1·8 (5·3) 2·8 (5·7) 3·0 (6·9) 1·2 (0·8 to 1·8) 0·29 0·5 (0·3 to 0·9) 0·012 1·0 (0·6 to 1·5) 0·81

Data are mean (SD). Results are derived from a model analysing data for 393 participants who had at least some 96-week outcome data. Numbers of patients are the maximum per group; the minimum sample size was n=380 for each secondary outcome (minimum per group: amiloride, n=98; fluoxetine, n=94; riluzole, n=92; placebo, n=94). The multiple regression model for each outcome included randomised treatment as an explanatory factor variable (with placebo as the reference category), the baseline measurement, and minimisation variables (age, sex, treatment centre, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score at baseline). EQ-5D-5L=EuroQol five dimensions five levels. VAS=visual analogue scale.

*

Effect sizes are adjusted mean difference (95% CI), except for new or enlarging T2 lesions, which is the adjusted rate ratio (investigational drug:placebo) and 95% CI.

95% CIs calculated using 1000 bootstrap resamples.

The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score was signed square-root transformed before analysis.