Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;26(6):657–669. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i6.657

Table 3.

Correlations between radiological response and prognostic systems for first transarterial chemoembolization

Prognostic system Score, median [IQR] Grade Radiological response, n
Spearman R (P value) Kappa (P value)
CR PR SD PD Total
HAP 2 [1-2] A 42 55 26 10 133 0.27 (0.028) 0.10 (0.020)
B 50 157 83 42 332
C 39 157 109 92 397
D 18 72 81 74 245
mHAP 1 [1-2] A 56 101 43 15 215 0.29 (0.028) 0.10 (0.020)
B 64 198 116 80 458
C 25 126 120 96 367
D 4 16 20 27 67
mHAP2 2 [2-3] A 13 11 7 2 33 0.27 (0.028) 0.07 (0.017)
B 50 91 53 19 213
C 50 180 98 58 386
D 36 159 141 139 475
mHAP3 0.41 [0.05-0.83] A 68 129 61 18 276 0.27 (0.028) 0.10 (0.020)
B 48 119 65 46 278
C 26 122 72 56 276
D 7 71 101 98 277
6&12 9.7 [7.5-12.9] A 70 114 51 22 257 0.39 (0.026) 0.14 (0.019)
B 58 145 56 46 305
C 18 114 85 54 271
D 3 68 107 96 274

HAP: Hepatoma Arterial-embolization Prognostic; mHAP: Modified HAP; 6&12: Six-and-twelve criteria; ART: Assessment for re-treatment with transarterial chemoembolization; ABCR: Alpha-fetoprotein, BCLC stage, Child-Pugh and Response.