Table 1.
Information source | Benefits | Challenges |
Professionel expertise | •Human judgement •Experience with specific populations •Includes local context |
•Depends on numbers and types of patients seen •Blind trust in the leading authority of clinicians •Variations in practice |
Scientific evidence | •Valuable new insights into the (cost-) effectiveness of medical interventions under well-controlled conditions | •Often derived from clinical trials with typically selected groups of patients |
•Difficult to capture personal preferences | ||
•Limited generalizability | ||
•Brief follow up and offering only a fragmented ‘’snapshot” view | ||
•Usually episodically assessment within a hospital setting where patients may behave differently from their usual performance | ||
Patient preferences | •Decision more tailed to individual preferences | •Challenging task on its own |
•Better therapeutic compliance | •Difficult to capture in exact measures | |
Big data approaches | •Unique perspective of an individual | •Challenging to find suitable datasets |
•Personalized prognosis, treatment predictions and adverse effects | •Leans on clinical expertise •Challenging to use outcomes in daily practice | |
•Support for clinicians and patients |