Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 19;19:22. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-00998-6

Table 3.

Discrimination and reclassification improvements of mtDNA 8-OHdG beyond the 2013 ACC/AHA PCE and the FRS in 1920 patients with T2DM

Risk estimates ACC/AHA 2013 PCE + mtDNA 8-OHdG FRS + mtDNA 8-OHdG
< 20% 20–50% > 50% Total Reclassified < 20% 20–50% > 50% Total Reclassified
Individuals without obstructive CAD, No.
 < 20% 268 23 0 291 8% 352 10 0 362 3%
 20–50% 68 275 41 384 28% 59 191 14 264 28%
 > 50% 0 48 143 191 25% 0 27 213 240 11%
 Total 336 346 184 866 411 228 227 866
Individuals with obstructive CAD, No.
 < 20% 125 30 3 158 21% 105 7 0 112 6%
 20–50% 35 288 82 405 29% 30 205 41 276 26%
 > 50% 0 35 456 491 7% 0 31 635 666 5%
 Total 160 353 541 1054 135 243 676 1054
Estimate (95% CI) P value Estimate (95% CI) P value
Δ C-statistic 0.024 (0.013–0.035) < 0.001 0.010 (0.003–0.017) 0.003
IDI 0.020 (0.014–0.026) < 0.001 0.014 (0.001–0.019) < 0.001
NRI continuous 0.299 (0.210–0.388) < 0.001 0.196 (0.107–0.286) < 0.001
NRI categorical 0.103 (0.064–0.142) < 0.001 0.059 (0.029–0.090) < 0.001

PCE ACC/AHA Pooled Cohorts Equations, FRS the Framingham Risk Score, IDI integrated discrimination improvement, NRI integrated discrimination improvement