Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;18:14. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-0453-6

Table 2.

Development process of SMART versions based on feedback received

Feedback Received (Reflect) Modification (Act)
Appearance and multimedia
Better visually represent the impact that SMART hopes to achieve i Homepage: photographs of diverse groups of students α
Facilitate the use of SMART for visually impaired users β Toggles onto the side of webpage to enable larger fonts and/or higher color contrasts L
Highlight new SMART features and enhancements β Homepage: widget “Recent News and Updates” with infographics L
Structure and design
Better explain the role of ISWP i “About us” webpage α
How can users to upload resources i “Contributions” webpage with dropbox α
How can educators help indicate the relevancy of their resources β “Contribute Form” and description of proper filename nomenclature L
Receive feedback/questions on SMART from users α Homepage: Email link to ISWP, analytics were made accessible to administrators β
Explain the purpose, intended users, development process and future developments of SMART α “About the Toolkit” β
How can users quickly contact ISWP for more information α “Contact Us” button on all webpages β
Need to organize resources uploaded onto SMART website α Nomenclature developed for files uploaded to SMART β
Invite users to participate in ISWP integration activities α “Participate/Get Involved” button β
Where to store occupational therapy [and other programs] education standards and related links α “Advocacy” folder β
Include resources aimed towards community-based facilities in addition to materials geared towards educational institutions α Under the “Advocacy” folder, sub-folder for “Community-based Services and/or Activities” β
Include resources containing additional information (e.g., student evaluation rubrics) α Under the “Syllabus” folder, sub-folder for Course Specifications β
Foster interaction and collaborations within the global community of wheelchair educators α Discussion board, “Interactive Map” with users who wish to be featured their contact information and their integration story β
Generate more interactions in the discussion board β Continuous revision at least once a week, periodically forum topics initiation, possibility for all users to start a new topic L
Concerns on the lack of vetting measures for resources uploaded to SMART, the ownership of the resources uploaded to SMART β “Conditions of Use” to inform users of specific conditions related to copyright, acknowledgement of original source and translation of materials into different languages L
Navigation
Organize search of resources on SMART website i, α, β

Search filters by

• Educational institutions α

• Document formats (e.g., text documents, images, videos) α

• WHO 8-Step Wheelchair Service Provision Model β

• International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework β

• Integration States β

• Resource settings (low, middle, high) L

• Languages L

• Rehabilitation Professions L

• Content types (e.g., case studies, lab guides, online modules) L

Lack of uniformity in its navigation β SMART menu at the top of each webpage for ease of navigation L
Content
With the established nomenclature, file names are very long. α Acronyms in SMART were considered inappropriate, as they may not translate well in different languages. “Contribution Form” helps users identify elements of their resources. β
Need to inform how the resources are up-to-date α All files are dated. β
Keep the shared resources as current as possible α Rather than document files of shared resources, website links are provided to direct users to original online sources. β
Need information about the integration of wheelchair education into academic curricula i Inclusion of results from survey study, interview study with links to other scientific articles on the topic and academic training partners (past and upcoming activities) α
Other wheelchair education resources other than ones shared and/or created by other educators α List of useful wheelchair education related textbooks and other publications β
How can users connect with the authors of the shared resources to receive more information β Contact information requested on all SMART resources L
How can users be sure whether or not they can use the shared resources? i Authors’ permission requested in the “Contribution Form” unless the tools are open-source. α
Text-based case studies are cumbersome to read. i Text modified into visual representations – “Integration Snapshots.” α

iInitial development; αAlpha Version; βBeta Version; LLaunch Version