Table 1.
Demographics and disease characteristics of included patients (n = 198)
| No. with available data | Included patients (n = 198) | |
|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||
| Sex, female, no. (%) | 198 | 145 (73.2) |
| Ethnicity, no. (%) | ||
| White | 161 | 140 (87.0) |
| Black | 161 | 16 (9.9) |
| Asian | 161 | 5 (3.1) |
| Age, mean ± SD, years | 198 | 51.1 ± 14.3 |
| Diseases characteristics | ||
| Autoantibody status a, no. (%) | ||
| Anti-nuclear antibody positive | 165 | 156 (94.5) |
| Anti-centromere | 152 | 43 (28.3) |
| Anti-topoisomerase | 152 | 85 (55.9) |
| Anti-RNAP3 | 152 | 8 (5.3) |
| Anti-U1 RNP | 152 | 9 (5.9) |
| Anti-PM/Scl | 152 | 6 (4.0) |
| Disease duration, median (IQR), years | 198 | 0.8 (0.4; 1.2) |
| Duration from RP, median (IQR), years | 187 | 1.3 (0.6; 3.9) |
| Follow-up, median (IQR), years | 198 | 6.3 (3.8; 8.9) |
| Skin variables | ||
| Cutaneous subset, limited, no. (%) | 195 | 98 (50.3) |
| mRSS, baseline, median (IQR) | 198 | 8 (2; 18) |
| Baseline organ involvement, no. (%) | ||
| Telangiectasia | 183 | 76 (41.5) |
| Calcinosis | 175 | 20 (11.4) |
| Joints | 191 | 114 (59.7) |
| Muscles | 194 | 53 (27.3) |
| Digital ulcers | 181 | 76 (42.0) |
| Gastrointestinal tracts | 187 | 99 (52.9) |
| Interstitial lung disease | 181 | 72 (39.8) |
| FVC, median % (IQR) | 160 | 96.0 (76.0; 108.0) |
| DLCO, median % (IQR) | 155 | 63.0 (50.0; 78.0) |
| Heart | 187 | 15 (8.0) |
| Pulmonary hypertension | 194 | 15 (7.7) |
| Renal crisis | 123 | 12 (9.8) |
| Biological variable, no. (%) | ||
| Baseline CRP level, ≥ 6 mg/L | 148 | 51 (34.5) |
| Treatments b, no. (%) | ||
| Steroids and/or IS | 189 | 127 (68.7) |
Numbers are given as % or mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range. Anti-RNAP3 anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies, CRP C-reactive protein; disease duration duration from the first non-RP symptom, DLCO diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (% predicted value), FVC forced vital capacity (% predicted value), RP Raynaud’s phenomenon
aThe sum of % may be different from 100% because some patients had either unidentified ANA or multiple autoantibodies
bDuring follow-up