Table 3.

Comparison of the proposed method with other methods

Method	Detection system	LOD (ng/mL)	RSD (%)	Liner range (ng/mL)	References
SPMEa	HPLC–UV	0.25–3.67	4.25–12.95	10.8–1585	[6]
SPMEb	GC-MSMS	0.26–2.63	2.08–9.02	1–1000	[21]
MWCNTs-DDM/PDMS SBSEc	HPLC–UV	0.14–1.76	6.2–11.6	1–1000	[38]
PDMS-SBSEd	GC–MS	0.1–0.4	6–27	1–15	[16]
SB-µ-SPEe	GC–MS	0.24	4.50	1–600	[46]
SUPRAS-microextractionf	HPLC–DAD	1–4	4.70–7.27	10–150	[47]
MWCNTs/NaDC SPME	HPLC–UV	0.15–0.30	5.7–11.9	1–100	Present study

^aMWCNTs-COOH fiber SPME

^bCarboxylated solid carbon spheres SPME

^cAmino modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polydimethylsiloxane coated stir bar sorptive extraction

^dPolydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) stir bar sorptive extraction

^eStir bar-supported micro-solid-phase extraction

^fSupramolecular solvent based microextraction