Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;8(2):2325967119899355. doi: 10.1177/2325967119899355

Table 4.

Comparison of Patients With Retears Between Both Groups in Terms of Tear Characteristics and Functional Outcomesa

Isolated SSC RCTs
(n = 5)
Combined AS RCTs
(n = 9)
P Value
Patients with Lafosse tear type IV, n (%) 5 (100) 4 (44.4) .037
Tear retraction of SSC, mm 28.6 ± 15 14.8 ± 4.7 .022
Superoinferior tear dimensions of SSC, mm 26 ± 9.6 14.7 ± 4.8 .012
Coracohumeral distance, mm 13.3 ± 4.4 10.3 ± 5 .369
Patients with preoperative unfavorable fatty degeneration of SSC, n (%) 3 (60) 4 (44.4) .557
Pain VAS 1 ± 2.2 0.8 ± 1.3 .823
Satisfaction VAS 6 ± 3.9 9.6 ± 0.7 .019
ASES score 86.3 ± 16.1 94.3 ± 5.4 .191
Simple Shoulder Test score 9 ± 2.5 11 ± 2 .128
Constant score 68.2 ± 5.4 69.9 ± 5.2 .576

aData are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. AS, anterosuperior; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; RCT, rotator cuff tear; SSC, subscapularis; VAS, visual analog scale.