Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 19;7(4):1901758. doi: 10.1002/advs.201901758

Figure 9.

Figure 9

a) SBU‐net cross formation in CPM‐300. b) A comparison of the Zn4O(CO2)6 SBU in MOF‐5 and that in CPM‐300 showing a symmetry reduction from antitrigonal prism (octahedron) to trigonal prism, when the geometry of the ligands is taken into account. c) A perspective view of CPM‐300, showing the chiral hexagonal channels along the c axis. d) In CPM‐301, by introducing the [Zn9(btz)12]6+ cluster, the 6‐connected [Zn9(btz)12]6+ and [Zn4O]6+ clusters are arranged alternatingly to form a pcu net of CPM‐301. e) The [Zn9(btz)12]6+ and [Zn4O]6+ clusters in CPM‐301. f) The connection between the [Zn4O]6+ and [Zn9(btz)12]6+ clusters. Adapted with permission.101 Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.