Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Aug;94(8):1444–1456. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.004

Table 3.

Results (HR (95%CI)) from Cox proportional hazards models estimating the association metformin (MET) vs. sulfonylurea (SU) and incident dementia in FY2002 to FY2015, overall and stratified by age among VHA patients ≥50 years old (n=75,187) and KPW patients ≥50 years old (n=10,866)

Model 1 – Crudea MET vs. SU: Model 2–Weightedb MET vs. SU: Model 3 −Weighted + AMGBc MET vs. SU:  Model 4−Weighted + hypoglycemic episode MET vs. SU

Age group VA patients KPW patients VA patients KPW patients VA patients KPW patients VA patients KPW patients
All ages ≥ 50 years 0.66
(0.62–0.70)
0.37
(0.32–0.44)
0.93
(0.87–0.99)
0.89
(0.74–1.07)
0.89
(0.83–0.95)
0.88
(0.73–1.07)
0.95
(0.78–0.99)
0.89
(0.73–1.07)

Age Strata

Age 50–64 years 0.85
(0.75–0.95)
1.04
(0.67–1.61)
0.86
(0.76–0.98)
1.33
(0.78–2.25)
0.84
(0.73–0.96)
1.35
(0.79–2.28)
0.89
(0.78–1.02)
1.36
(0.80–2.31)
Age 65–74 years 0.87
(0.80–0.95)
0.76
(0.58–0.98)
0.87
(0.80–0.96)
0.79
(0.58–1.07)
0.87
(0.79–0.96)
0.78
(0.58–1.06)
0.89
(0.81–0.98)
0.79
(0.58–1.08)
Age ≥75 years 1.05
(0.95–1.16)
0.78
(0.62–0.99)
1.03
(0.9–1.14)
0.79
(0.60–1.03)
1.02
(0.91–1.15)
0.82
(0.62–1.07)
1.05
(0.94–1.16)
0.81
(0.61–1.06)

Note: VHA=Veterans Health Administration; KPW=Kaiser Permanente Washington State; FY=Fiscal Year; MET=Metformin; SU=Sulfonylurea; AMGB=average monthly glycemic burden; HR=hazard ratio; CI=confidence interval

a

Unweighted data

b

Inverse probability of treatment weighted data with robust, sandwich-type variance estimators

c

Additional adjustment for glycemic burden from MET/SU initiation to end of follow-up among a subset of 71,266 VA patients and 10,743 with at least 2 HbA1c values after MET/SU initiation