Table 4.

Supplementation with 30 mg/kg BW/day XN or its derivatives DXN and TXN alters the relative fecal microbial abundance^c

	CON	XN	DXN	TXN	SEM	XN vs CON	DXN vs CON	TXN vs CON
	Microbial Abundance (counts/detected ASV)					P-values (Comparisons)
Total	122	126	124	105	7	0.65	0.84	0.07
Firmicutes	93	102	128	115	9	0.44	0.005	0.07
Lachnospiraceae	109	127	159	142	12	0.30	0.005	0.06
Ruminococcaceae	15	6	3	2	5	0.10	0.06	0.02
Erysipelotrichaceae	10	12	23	22	2	0.49	<0.001	0.001
Eubacteriaceae	744	119	45	30	62	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
Peptostreptococcaceae	67	94	74	25	28	0.56	0.82	0.22
Clostridiaceae	18	3	1	1	19	0.19	0.21	0.42
Halobacteroidacea	102	73	3	0	39	0.08	0.02	<0.001
Lactobacillaceae	86	121	182	184	14	0.08	<0.001	<0.001
Paenibacillaceae	1.0	1.7	2.0	1.4	0.9	0.48	0.28	0.63
Natranaerovirga	1	0	120	3	375	<0.001	0.44	0.99
Enterococcaceae	6.7	2.0	2.5	3.8	4.1	0.11	0.36	0.31
Staphylococcaceae	3.5	3.0	2.3	1.0	1.0	0.67	0.30	0.08
Bacillaceae	1.1	1.7	1.8	1.3	0.3	0.11	0.07	0.54
Bacteroidetes	262	293	87	33	24	0.37	<0.001	<0.001
Porphyromonadaceae	276	314	101	41	28	0.32	<0.001	<0.001
Flavobacteriaceae	1.5	1.9	2.1	2.1	0.4	0.44	0.25	0.25
Chitinophagaceae	1.7	1.4	1.9	1.6	0.3	0.41	0.71	0.85
Rikenellaceae	3.1	2.6	1.2	1.0	1.4	0.63	0.16	0.20
Verrucomicrobia	254	220	517	451	158	0.88	0.25	0.39
Verrucomicrobiaceae	254	220	517	451	166	0.88	0.25	0.39
Tenericutes	50	0	0	0	15	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
Anaeroplasmataceae	50	0	0	0	0	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
Actinobacteria	34	40	30	11	8	0.65	0.75	0.06
Coriobacteriaceae	34	40	30	11	8	0.64	0.78	0.06
Proteobacteria	1.9	2.3	4.5	2.9	0.8	0.72	0.02	0.37
Enterobacteriaceae	1.8	2.1	6.7	2.8	1.7	0.86	0.03	0.65
Comamonadaceae	2.5	3.0	4.6	5.1	1.0	0.71	0.12	0.07
Oxalobacteraceae	1.2	1.8	2.2	1.6	0.3	0.07	0.004	0.20
Sphingomonadaceae	1.6	1.6	1.8	1.6	0.2	0.99	0.58	0.98
Methylobacteriaceae	1.0	1.0	2.0	5.5	2.4	1.00	0.72	0.18
Pseudomonas	1.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	0.5	1	0.14	1

^cPhyla and families within phyla are organized in the order of microbial number.