Table 6.
Bile Acid Metabolism | CON | XN | DXN | TXN | SEM | XN vs CON | DXN vs CON | TXN vs CON |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene | ΔCT | P-values (Comparisons) | ||||||
Bile Acid Synthesis | ||||||||
Cyp7a1 | Ref. | 1.15 | 1.64 | 2.16 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.16 | 0.04 |
Cyp27a1 | Ref. | 1.21 | −1.08 | −1.15 | 0.87 | 0.33 | 0.68 | 0.49 |
Cyp8b1 | Ref. | 1.29 | 1.16 | 1.22 | 0.86 | 0.21 | 0.47 | 0.34 |
Bile Acid Secretion | ||||||||
Fxr | Ref. | −1.07 | 1.28 | 1.27 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.22 | 0.25 |
Shp | Ref. | 1.91 | 3.62 | 2.98 | 0.74 | 0.12 | 0.003 | 0.01 |
Bsep | Ref. | 1.03 | −1.56 | −1.84 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.04 | 0.008 |
All the threshold cycle (Ct) numbers were normalized to a reference gene, tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, Ywhaz, which others and we determined to be relatively stable in most mouse tissues (data not shown)[17]. The fold-change compared to the control (HFD) was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Ref: HFD control mice were used as the reference.