Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Jan 9;112:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.001

Table 4.

Moderation of the relationship between goal difficulty and goal achievement

Goal Achievement NDD Goal Achievement HDD

B SE OR 95% Confidence Interval of the OR p B SE OR 95% Confidence Interval of the OR p
Goal importance 0.06 .04 1.06 [0.98, 1.14] .17 −0.01 0.04 0.99 [0.91, 1.08] .82
Goal difficulty*Goal importance −0.04 .08 0.96 [0.81, 1.13] .60 0.04 0.05 1.04 [0.94, 1.16] .44

Self-efficacy 0.00 .002 1.00 [0.99, 1.00] .92 −0.004 .003 1.00 [0.99, 1.00] .17
Goal difficulty*Self-efficacy −0.01 .004 0.99 [0.99, 1.00] .16 −0.001 .003 1.00 [0.99, 1.00] .69

ADS 0.05 0.02 1.05 [1.01, 1.09] .01 −0.04 0.02 0.96 [0.92, 0.998] .04
Goal difficulty*ADS −0.02 0.04 0.98 [0.92, 1.05] .61 −0.01 0.02 0.99 [0.95, 1.04] .74

Note: B = the estimated slope of the dependent variable as a function of the predictor; SE = Standard Error for the B; OR = Odds Ratio. Main effects of moderators shown here are those generated by models excluding the interaction term. Each moderator was tested independently (i.e., by itself, apart from the other moderators).