. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2019 Sep 9;28(1):66–78. doi: 10.1002/erv.2700

Table 3.

Bootstrapped regression analyses of moderated mediation: Treatment condition moderates the longitudinal interpersonal model of binge eating and related psychopathology over the course of psychotherapy treatment (solid + dashed lines in Figure 2).

Dependent variable	Treatment type	Effect	Bootstrapped
Dependent variable	Treatment type	Effect	SE	95% CI	95% CI for Index of Moderated Mediation
Primary dependent variable:
Binge-eating frequency n =145	CBT	1.72	1.60	(−.48, 6.13)	(−3.35, 6.48)
Binge-eating frequency n =145	IPT	3.13	2.15	(.04, 8.23)	(−3.35, 6.48)
Secondary dependent variables:
Global ED psychopathology n =143	CBT	.17	.09	(.02, .38)	(−.20, .40)
Global ED psychopathology n =143	IPT	.24	.13	(.05, .57)	(−.20, .40)
Shape concern n =145	CBT	.26	.17	(−.02, .63)	(−.35, .64)
Shape concern n =145	IPT	.39	.21	(.09, .87)	(−.35, .64)
Weight concern n =145	CBT	.30	.18	(.02, .73)	(−.55, .47)
Weight concern n =145	IPT	.24	.22	(−.09, .79)	(−.55, .47)

ED=eating disorder; SE=standard error; CI=confidence interval; Bolded CIs indicate a significant indirect effect.