Table 3.

Model-Based Estimated Change in Potential Interpersonal Mediators and Rank Preserving Model Results

	TX → Mediator (path a)				Rank Preserving Model (path b)
Potential Mediator	Estimated Change IPT-AST (SE)	Estimated Change GC (SE)	Treatment Contrast  t(df)   p		Mediator→CES-D | INT t(df)  p		Mediator→CGAS |INT t(df)  p
FACTOR 1	−.07 (.09)	−.06 (.08)	t(156) = .10	.92	t(153) =−.58	.56	t(154) =− 2.18	.03
FACTOR 2	−.06 (.11)	.17 (.11)	t(156) = 1.71	.09	t(153) = −1.40	.16	t(153) = 1.36	.17
FACTOR 3	−.001 (.13)	−.06 (.12)	t(156) = − .39	.70	t(153) = −1.25	.21	t(153) = 1.70	.09
NON-LOADERS
Friend Functioning (SAS-SR)	−.13 (.06)	−.06 (.05)	t(173) = .97	.33	t(170) = 1.26	.21	t(170) = −1.57	.12
Romantic Functioning (SAS-SR)	−.18 (.08)	−.03 (.07)	t(174) = 1.53	.13	t(171) = 1.99	.047	t(171) = −1.98	.047
Conflict – Peer (NRI)	−.17 (.26)	.42 (.27)	t(171) = 1.66	.10	t(168) = 1.69	.09	t(168) = −2.00	.046
Conflict – Father (CBQ)	−.13 (.39)	−.15 (.35)	t(162) = −.05	.96	t(159) = −1.10	.27	t(159) = .81	.42

Notes. INT= intervention