Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;26(2):249–258. doi: 10.1111/odi.13201

Table 1.

Overview of studies evaluating the association between oral health and cognition

Study Study type Population Outcome(s) Results
Luo et al., 2015 Human cohort study

Dementia (n = 120)

MCI (n = 554)

Cognitive normal (n = 2,389)

Mean (SD) teeth missing

Dementia: 18.7 (11.0)

MCI: 11.8 (9.9)

Cognitive normal: 9.3 (9.3)

Park et al., 2013 Human cohort study

Number of teeth lost:

6–10 teeth

>10 teeth

Cognitive impairment based on MMSE < 24

6–10 teeth: aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.08–3.69

>10 teeth: aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.26–4.02

Takeuchi et al., 2017 Human cohort study

Number of remaining teeth: ≥20 (n = 893)

10–19 (n = 328)

1–9 (n = 204)

0 (n = 121)

All‐cause dementia

10–19: aHR 1.62, 95% CI 1.06–2.46

1–9: aHR 1.81, 95% CI 2.94

0: aHR 1.63, 95% 0.95–2.80

Gatz et al., 2006 Human case–control twin study

Demented (n = 82)

Not demented (n = 82)

Oral disease from tooth loss Demented versus non‐demented: OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.34–9.70
Stein et al., 2007 Human cohort study

Number of non‐third molars:

0 (n = 25)

1–9 (n = 26)

10–16 (n = 27)

17–28 (n = 66)

Number of non‐third molars with apoE4 allele:

0 (n = 3)

1–9 (n = 6)

10–16 (n = 5)

17–28 (n = 18)

Dementia

All participants

0: OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.25–3.12

1–9: OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.58–5.46

10–16: OR 0.4, 95% 0.10–1.76

ApoE4 allele:

0: OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.01–3.7

1–9: OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.04–5.6

10–16: OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.02–3.6

Shimazaki et al., 2001 Human cohort study

Dentition status:

>20 teeth (n = 150)

1–19 teeth with dentures (n = 440)

1–19 teeth not using dentures (n = 371)

Edentulous using dentures (n = 621)

Edentulous not using dentures (n = 347)

Six‐year mental impairment

1–19 teeth with dentures: OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.8–4.6

1–19 teeth not using dentures: OR 2.3, 95% CI 0.9–5.8

Edentulous using dentures: OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.7–4.0

Edentulous not using dentures: OR 2.4, 95% CI 0.9–6.5

Stewart et al., 2013 Human cohort study

Quartile of oral health parameters:

Q1 (n = 264)

Q2 (n = 186)

Q3 (n = 110)

Q4 (n = 46)

Cognitive impairment

Per oral health quartile increase:

OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.48–0.67

Chen et al., 2015 Human cross‐sectional study

CIND (n = 57)

Dementia (n = 51)

No cognitive impairment (n = 492)

Number of carious teeth or retained roots while adjusting for the capacity to perform oral hygiene

CIND: RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.13–2.46

Dementia: RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.23–2.70

Cho et al., 2018 Human cohort study

Normal cognitive ability (n = 284)

Dementia (n = 61)

Oral health Demented versus non‐demented: OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.08–4.83
Oue et al., 2013 Interventional, prospective study (J20 mice)

Maxillary molar teeth removed (n = 10)

Control group with intact molars (n = 10)

Impact of tooth loss on acquisition (learning) versus retention (memory) latency

Retention versus acquisition latency (p < .05)

Retention latency: 293.6 + 6.1 s

Acquisition latency: 88.9 + 17.4 s

Oue et al., 2016 Interventional, prospective study (Tg2576 mice)

Maxillary molar teeth removed (n = 9)

Control group with intact molars (n = 10)

Impact of tooth loss on acquisition (learning) and retention (memory) latency

Acquisition latency (p > .05):

Molar teeth removed: 89.0 + 17.9 s

Control group: 172.0 + 40.7 s

Retention latency (p < .05):

Molar teeth removed: 300.0 + 0 s

Control group: 296.7 + 3.3 s

He et al., 2014 Interventional, prospective study (SAMP8 mice)

4‐month‐old mice:

Alveolar nerve transection (experimental) (n = 20)

Sham surgery (control) (n = 20)

7‐month‐old mice:

Alveolar nerve transection (experimental) (n = 10)

Sham surgery (control) (n = 10)

Escape latency

Learning rate

Escape latency significantly greater in elderly experimental group than elderly control group in five‐minute acquisition session (p < .05)

Elderly control: 39.70 + 14.84 s

Elderly experimental: 63.60 + 15.31 s

Learning rate in elderly mice significantly poorer in experimental group versus controls (p < .05)

Elderly control: 18.50 + 5.44

Elderly experimental: 25.90 + 6.21

Kubo et al., 2017 Interventional, prospective study (SAMP8 mice)

Molars removed (n = 33)

Molars intact (n = 33)

Plasma cortisol levels

Time in Morris water maze

Higher plasma cortisone levels in early tooth loss group (p = .016)

Early tooth loss group required more time in Morris water maze test (p = .016)

Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CIND, cognitive impairment, no dementia; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MMSE, mini‐mental state examination; RR, relative risk; SD, standard deviation.