Table 3.
Post-hoc analysis at the node-level using the AAL atlas when the periventricular WMHs were considered. Significant results are reported in bold italics.
| Region | Group comparison | Post-hoc analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOF | T-value | p-value | ||
| R. Inferior orbitofrontal cortex | lw-no vs. lw-o | 89 | 0.3189 | 0.7506 |
| lw-no vs. hw-no | 105 | −0.5436 | 0.7054 | |
| lw-no vs. hw-o | 84 | −3.3484 | 0.0037 | |
| lw-o vs. hw-no | 94 | −0.8293 | 0.6136 | |
| lw-o vs. hw-o | 73 | −3.5445 | 0.0037 | |
| hw-no vs. hw-o | 89 | −2.8019 | 0.0125 | |
| R. Dorsal medial prefrontal cortex | lw-no vs. lw-o | 89 | −0.2030 | 0.9600 |
| lw-no vs. hw-no | 105 | 0.0502 | 0.9600 | |
| lw-no vs. hw-o | 84 | −2.8874 | 0.0148 | |
| lw-o vs. hw-no | 94 | 0.2505 | 0.9600 | |
| lw-o vs. hw-o | 73 | −2.5702 | 0.0244 | |
| hw-no vs. hw-o | 89 | −2.9481 | 0.0148 | |
lw, low WMH burden; hw, high WMH burden; o, obese; no, non-obese; DOF, degrees of freedom.