Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 19;10:2930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60054-x

Table 4.

Post-hoc analysis at the node-level using the Brainnetome atlas.

Criteria – Region Group comparison Post-hoc analysis
DOF T-value p-value
Total WMHs – R. Orbitofrontal cortex (A12/47o) lw-no vs. lw-o 89 0.7045 0.4854
lw-no vs. hw-no 105 −0.7001 0.4854
lw-no vs. hw-o 88 −3.0994 0.0079
lw-o vs. hw-no 90 −1.2965 0.2970
lw-o vs. hw-o 73 −3.3121 0.0079
hw-no vs. hw-o 89 −2.466 0.0312
Periventricular WMHs – R. Orbitofrontal cortex (A12/47o) lw-no vs. lw-o 89 0.7045 0.4854
lw-no vs. hw-no 105 −0.7001 0.4854
lw-no vs. hw-o 84 −3.0994 0.0079
lw-o vs. hw-no 94 −1.2965 0.2970
lw-o vs. hw-o 73 −3.3121 0.0079
hw-no vs. hw-o 89 −2.466 0.0312
Periventricular WMHs – L. Orbitofrontal cortex (A11) lw-no vs. lw-o 89 0.5863 0.6710
lw-no vs. hw-no 105 1.0159 0.4680
lw-no vs. hw-o 84 −1.4756 0.2876
lw-o vs. hw-no 94 0.3010 0.7641
lw-o vs. hw-o 73 −2.0591 0.1291
hw-no vs. hw-o 89 −2.8289 0.0346

lw, low WMH burden; hw, high WMH burden; o, obese; no, non-obese; DOF, degrees of freedom.

Significant results are shown in bold italics.