Table 4.
Criteria – Region | Group comparison | Post-hoc analysis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DOF | T-value | p-value | ||
Total WMHs – R. Orbitofrontal cortex (A12/47o) | lw-no vs. lw-o | 89 | 0.7045 | 0.4854 |
lw-no vs. hw-no | 105 | −0.7001 | 0.4854 | |
lw-no vs. hw-o | 88 | −3.0994 | 0.0079 | |
lw-o vs. hw-no | 90 | −1.2965 | 0.2970 | |
lw-o vs. hw-o | 73 | −3.3121 | 0.0079 | |
hw-no vs. hw-o | 89 | −2.466 | 0.0312 | |
Periventricular WMHs – R. Orbitofrontal cortex (A12/47o) | lw-no vs. lw-o | 89 | 0.7045 | 0.4854 |
lw-no vs. hw-no | 105 | −0.7001 | 0.4854 | |
lw-no vs. hw-o | 84 | −3.0994 | 0.0079 | |
lw-o vs. hw-no | 94 | −1.2965 | 0.2970 | |
lw-o vs. hw-o | 73 | −3.3121 | 0.0079 | |
hw-no vs. hw-o | 89 | −2.466 | 0.0312 | |
Periventricular WMHs – L. Orbitofrontal cortex (A11) | lw-no vs. lw-o | 89 | 0.5863 | 0.6710 |
lw-no vs. hw-no | 105 | 1.0159 | 0.4680 | |
lw-no vs. hw-o | 84 | −1.4756 | 0.2876 | |
lw-o vs. hw-no | 94 | 0.3010 | 0.7641 | |
lw-o vs. hw-o | 73 | −2.0591 | 0.1291 | |
hw-no vs. hw-o | 89 | −2.8289 | 0.0346 |
lw, low WMH burden; hw, high WMH burden; o, obese; no, non-obese; DOF, degrees of freedom.
Significant results are shown in bold italics.